UCEED 2025 Exam Analysis: Check Complete Question Paper Review
Upcoming Event
CEED Exam Date:18 Jan' 26 - 18 Jan' 26
UCEED 2025 was conducted on January 19, 2025 by Indian Institute of Technology (IIT) Bombay. The UCEED 2025 exams analysis is given below in this article. This analysis will address aspects like the level of difficulty of the exam, how many attempts would be considered good, the aim topics of the exam on a sectional basis. IIT Bombay has announced the cutoff marks for UCEED 2025 for round 1 on April, 22, 2025 at http://www.uceed.iitb.ac.in/2025/. On February 6, 2025, the Indian Institute of Technology, Bombay published the Part-A UCEED exam cutoff 2025 at ceed.iitb.ac.in. Students can refer to this UCEED 2025 Question Paper with solutions for in depth understanding. The UCEED 2025 results will be declared on March 7th, 2025, on the official website: www.uceed.iitb.ac.in.
This Story also Contains
- UCEED Exam Analysis 2025 – General Feedback
- UCEED 2025 – Key Concerns Of Students
- Section wise Analysis for UCEED 2025
UCEED Exam Analysis 2025 – General Feedback
The overall evaluation of the UCEED 2025 exam can be found in the table below and get access to UCEED 2025 question paper also. The candidate’s point of view for the UCEED 2025 exam is stated so that everyone knows what to expect:
Section | Good Attempts | Difficulty Level |
Part A: Numerical Answer Type (NAT) | Moderate to High (No Math) | Easy |
Part A: Multiple Select Questions (MSQ) | High | Very Easy |
Part A: Multiple Choice Questions (MCQ) | Moderate | Moderate (More GK-focused) |
Part B: Drawing Section | High | Very Easy |
Overall | Moderate to High | Moderate |
UCEED 2025 – Key Concerns Of Students
1. Heavy General Knowledge (GK) Component
A large number of students had a considerable problem with the focus on General Knowledge, especially within the scope of the Multiple Choice Questions’ section. Those learners who did not prepare adequately for this subject seemed to have been at a disadvantage, as compared to their counterparts who had a good command of GK.
2. Numerical Answer Type (NAT) Section Without Mathematics
It also came as a surprise to the students as it was not only non mathematician in nature but also departed from the normal UCEED 2025 Part A question paper format. While this made the section easier for some, those who districted themselves from preparing for mathematical questions felt their preparation for such questions was wasted.
3. Easy Drawing Section
The other 2 parts were also thought to be relatively easier. The drawing section in UCEED Part B question paper drew competitive edge especially in relation to scoring good marks. It was felt by a good number of students who had appeared for the examination and were of the opinion that the drawing questions were simpler (train station scene and product design) which should have warranted higher differentiation in the scores.
4. Similarity to 2015-2016 Papers
The resemblance with older UCEED papers or the 2015-2016 is one aspect that students do not like and in particular the pattern of the papers, as the structure of the paper nowadays seems predetermined. Those learners basing their preparations on recent trends did not feel so confident as they actually were.
5. Difficulty Variation Across Sections
MSQ was regarded as quite simple, while the MCQ section was moderately difficult because there was an emphasis on General Knowledge, resulting in a disparity in the global degree of difficulty.
6. Time Management
Some students reported struggling to balance time between the Part A and Part B sections, particularly with Part A having multiple components.
7. Competition and Scoring
With the ease of certain sections (especially Part B and MSQ), students are worried about higher cutoffs and reduced margins for error.
Section wise Analysis for UCEED 2025
Numerical Answer Type (NAT)
Difficulty Level | The difficulty level was Moderate to Easy |
Ideal Time | 35-40 minutes |
Good Attempt | 10-12 questions (No Negative Marking) |
Focus Areas | Logical and Visual Interpretation |
The Major update this year in 2025 is an increased weightage of the Logical and Non-Visual Questions, giving an opportunity to aspirants for a wider variety of question choices. Overall the NAT Section was perfectly balanced for an opportunity for each individual to perform through the time management and subjective strength of an individual in different question types. In comparison to the year 2024 the questions were balanced for easy to moderate in difficulty level and lesser time consuming in solution.
Multiple Select Questions (MSQ)
Difficulty Level | The difficulty level was Moderate |
Ideal Time | 30- 35 minutes |
Good Attempt | 12-13 questions(marks for each question but negative marking for every wrong option marked) |
Focus Areas | Spatial Ability + Mechanical Aptitude + Fundamental Design Principles |
Overall, the MSQ section was easy but time-consuming and equally opportunistic for the aspirants who have trained themselves in observation skills and know the tricks to quickly visualize by drawing objects. Once again, time management is the key to solving the questions and identifying all the correct options. Further, some logic-based Questions like Quest No. 26 were easy if one cracked the logic promptly within the stipulated time.
Multiple Choice Questions (MCQ)
Difficulty Level | Easy and Scoring |
Ideal Time | 35-40 minutes |
Good Attempt | 22-25 questions |
Focus Areas | Logic and Observation, Understanding of Daily life Objects and Surrounding, Verbal and Non-Verbal Reasoning, Logical Aptitude |
Multiple-choice Questions are more tricky in that the possibility of finding the right option is only 25% for the correct choice, but a wrong answer tricks to a loss of (-1) mark, reducing an individual's overall score and thus affecting the merit. This section was perfectly balanced, comprising both easy-moderate (time-consuming) questions where most questions were easily doable and could have contributed to the individual score very well. Questions were purely logical and general awareness-based.
Part-B (Drawing Questions)
This section was well-received by students. The drawing questions included perspective drawing and product design related questions which were easy to moderate in difficulty level. With daily practice and innovative thinking, this sections would have been easily solved by the students.
Detailed overview of UCEED 2025
Given below are the tips for UCEED 2025
Section | Difficulty Level | Topics Covered | Remarks |
Part A: Numerical Answer Type (NAT) | Easy | Analytical reasoning, logical thinking | No mathematics questions this year, making it easier for non-math candidates. |
Part A: Multiple Select Questions (MSQ) | Very Easy | Design aptitude, visual and spatial ability | Straightforward questions; practice mock tests to gain confidence. |
Part A: Multiple Choice Questions (MCQ) | Moderate | General Knowledge (heavy focus), aptitude | Focus on GK, especially related to design, history, and current events. |
Part B: Drawing Section | Very Easy | Train station scene, product design | Creative questions; practice similar scenes and product designs to excel. |
Recommended eBooks
Related eBooks & Sample Papers
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)
Q: What was the overall difficulty level of UCEED 2025?
A:
The exam was moderately difficult overall. Part A had varying difficulty levels, with MSQ being very easy, MCQ moderately challenging (heavy on General Knowledge), and NAT relatively easy due to the absence of mathematics. Part B (Drawing Section) was very easy.
Q: How important was General Knowledge (GK) in the UCEED 2025 exam?
A:
GK played a significant role, particularly in the MCQ section. Many questions had a strong inclination toward design-related and general GK topics
Q: Were part-B drawing questions lengthy in UCEED 2025?
A:
No, part-B drawing questions were not lengthy in UCEED 2025 and were fairly easy.
Articles
Related Stories
|
Upcoming Design Exams
Certifications By Top Providers
Explore Top Universities Across Globe
University of Essex, Colchester
Wivenhoe Park Colchester CO4 3SQUniversity College London, London
Gower Street, London, WC1E 6BTThe University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh
Old College, South Bridge, Edinburgh, Post Code EH8 9YLUniversity of Delaware, Newark
Newark, DE 19716University of Nottingham, Nottingham
University Park, Nottingham NG7 2RDBristol Baptist College, Bristol
The Promenade, Clifton Down, Bristol BS8 3NJPopular Courses and Specializations
List of colleges accepting CEED
Browse Design Colleges by State
Questions related to CEED
On Question asked by student community
Have a question related to CEED ?
Hii
Common Entrance Examination for Design is a test includes design aptitude, your creativity, visualisation, problem-solving, and also analytical ability.
CEED exam structure is divided in 2 parts (PART A & PART B) and you can check what to study and syllabus of CEED on career360 https://design.careers360.com/articles/ceed-syllabus-2025
CEED syllabus includes:
Visualization and spatial ability
Design thinking and problem solving
Drawing skills
Creativity
Communication skills
Analytical and logical reasoning
Environmental and social awareness
Observation and design sensitivity Also includes topics on form, function, aesthetics, and technical drawing.
Hello Anushka,
Thanks for reaching out!
You can definitely prepare for CEED to pursue UI/UX design.since you're not from design background you'll need 4-6 months of focused prepration.
Focus on:
Sketching
Visual communication
Design concepts
User experience basics
Problem - solving skills
Past CEED papers.
Practice drawings, story boarding, Idea generation daily.
You can also take online courses to learn design fundamentals and tools.
Consistency and practice matter most!
get all the detailed info here:
https://design.careers360.com/articles/ceed-syllabus
All the best!
Hello sir,
Thanks for reaching out!
Yes, you still have a good chance even with a mid CEED score, if the rest of your profile is strong. While the CEED score is important, most of the institutes use full selection process that includes your CEED score(Part A and B), Portfolio and often an interview or studio tests.Your 6 years of experience, strong portfolio and relevant coursera certificates can add significant value during admission in IITDM, Srishti etc which consider the overall profile not just the rank.
You can get free study material for the CEED (Common Entrance Exam for Design) from several reliable sources. Here's a simple list of where to find it:
Official CEED Website
Go to the
CEED official site (ceed.iitb.ac.in)
for previous year question papers and sample papers. They are the best for understanding the exam pattern.
NID and CEED Prep YouTube Channels
Many educators and toppers upload free tutorials, sketching tips, design aptitude tricks, and analysis of previous papers.
Telegram Groups
Search for “CEED preparation” on Telegram. Many groups share PDFs, notes, sketching practice sheets, and mock tests.
Free Blogs and Websites
Look for blogs like Pahal Design, BRDS, and Design Aspirants. They often post free reading material, tips, and past year questions.
Reddit and Quora
On platforms like Reddit or Quora, search for CEED preparation threads. Toppers often share their notes and resources.
Applications for Admissions are open.
Tie-ups with over 100 international Universities in USA, UK, France and Australia. Wide Range of scholarships available.
Sanskaram University M.design Admissions 2025
Apply100+ Industry collaborations | 10+ Years of legacy
Apeejay Stya University M.Design Admissions 2025
ApplyNAAC A Grade | Trans-Disciplinary Approach | Global Diversity
SAGE University Bhopal M.Des Admissions 2025
ApplyAvail upto 100% Merit Based Scholarships
Creative Edge Design Exam Coaching By Toprankers
ApplyChoose Creative Edge by TopRankers for Design Test Preparation
Vivekananda Global University M.Design Admissions 2025
ApplyNAAC A+ Grade | Among top 25 in India (ARIIA Rankings)
CEED Notifications
Never miss an CEED update
Get timely CEED updates directly to your inbox. Stay informed!