Srishti Manipal Entrance and Aptitude Test
Question : The value of $\frac{5-2 \div 4 \times[5-(3-4)]+5 \times 4 \div 2 \text { of } 4}{4+4 \div 8 \text { of } 2 \times(8-5) \times 2 \div 3-8 \div 2 \text { of } 8}$ is:
Option 1: $\frac{9}{8}$
Option 2: $\frac{9}{4}$
Option 3: $\frac{15}{32}$
Option 4: $\frac{89}{4}$
Correct Answer: $\frac{9}{8}$
Solution : Given: $\frac{5-2 \div 4 \times[5-(3-4)]+5 \times 4 \div 2 \text { of } 4}{4+4 \div 8 \text { of } 2 \times(8-5) \times 2 \div 3-8 \div 2 \text { of } 8}$ = $\frac{5-\frac{2}{4} \times6+5 \times 4 \div 8}{4+4 \div 16 \times3 \times 2
Question : Directions: If FRIEND is coded as HUMJTK, how can CANDLE be written in that code?
Option 1: EDRIRL
Option 2: ESJFME
Option 3: DCQHQK
Option 4: DEQJQM
Correct Answer: EDRIRL
Solution : Given: FRIEND is coded as HUMJTK.
Add consecutive natural numbers to the place value of the letters of the given words to get the code. FRIEND is coded HUMJTK – F + 2 = H; R + 3 = U; I + 4 = M;
Question : Directions: Two statements are given followed by two conclusions numbered I and II. Assuming the statements to be true, even if they seem to be at variance with commonly known facts, decide which of the conclusions logically follow(s) from the statements. Statements: No girl is a horse. Rachel is a girl. Conclusions: I. Rachel is not a horse. II. All girls are not Rachel.
Option 1: Both conclusions I and II follow
Option 2: Neither conclusion I nor II follows
Option 3: Only conclusion I follows
Option 4: Only conclusion II follows
Correct Answer: Only conclusion I follows
Solution : The possible Venn diagram according to the given statement is as follows –
Let's analyse the conclusions – Conclusion I: Rachel is not a horse – From the Venn diagram, it is evident that Rachel is a girl and no girl is
Question : Parts of the following sentence have been given as options. Select the option that contains a grammatical error.
Bobo was / very richer than Jim / as he had illicitly accumulated / all his wealth.
Option 1: very richer than jim
Option 2: all his wealth
Option 3: as he had illicitly accumulated
Option 4: Bobo has
Correct Answer: very richer than jim
Solution : The first option is correct.
In the sentence provided, the error lies in the use of very with the comparative form of the adjective "rich". When making comparisons, adjectives like rich form their comparative and superlative degrees without the use of very
Question : Assertion : (A)The talent gap in India needs to be closed in order to improve human capital and create a more productive labour force. Reason (R): Because skills are observable and transferable, their owner is not required.
Option 1: Both Assertion (A) and Reason (R) are true and Reason (R) is the correct explanation of Assertion (A).
Option 2: Both Assertion (A) and Reason (R) are true and Reason (R) is not the correct explanation of Assertion (A).
Option 3: Assertion (A) is true but Reason (R) is False.
Option 4: Assertion (A) is False but Reason (R) is true.
Correct Answer: Assertion (A) is true but Reason (R) is False.
Solution : A person with higher education is more skilled and productive. He has the capacity to learn new abilities and create novel approaches. Skills are intangible in nature and can't be separated from their owner. Hence option c
The Question containing Inaapropriate or Abusive Words
Question lacks the basic details making it difficult to answer
Topic Tagged to the Question are not relevant to Question
Question drives traffic to external sites for promotional or commercial purposes
The Question is not relevant to User
And never miss an important update